Pandora IPO Reminds Us What 1999 Felt Like

We have a long way to go before another bubble in Internet stocks emerges but the recent IPO of LinkedIn (LNKD) and today’s debut of Pandora (P) serve as reminders of what the late 1990′s brought us. Back when Yahoo! (YHOO) was worth more than Disney (DIS) and AOL (AOL) was worth more than (and bought) Time Warner (TWX) there were plenty of bullish pundits arguing why the dot-com versions were indeed worth more because they had far more growth opportunities. While plenty of Internet companies proved to be worth those sky-high valuations, many more did not, including the aforementioned duo.

This morning Internet radio sensation Pandora has seen its stock jump nearly 50% from an IPO price of $16 per share. As a result, Wall Street is valuing the company at a stunning $3.75 billion despite revenue estimates for 2011 of only about $250 million (and more importantly, no profits). How does that compare with some non-dot-com radio competitors? Both Cumulus Media (CMLS) and Sirius XM Radio (SIRI) are valued at about 3 times revenues (including net debt). Cumulus, the more traditional radio play, has about the same annual revenue as Pandora (but has positive cash flow) and carries an enterprise value of around $700 million, approximately 80% less than Pandora.

Sirius XM may be the more relevent comp given that just a few short years ago they were considered the new age upstart in the radio business (and they adopted the subscriber model that many believe holds the key to Pandora’s future success). Sirius XM does have a public market enterprise value of $10.4 billion, three times that of Pandora, but with that comes annual revenue of $3 billion (12 times more than Pandora) and over $800 million in annual operating cash flow. Put another way, Sirius’s operating profits trumps Pandora’ operating revenue by a factor of three.

As was the case back in the late 1990′s, some of these new Internet companies will grow into their valuations and not leave early public market buyers hanging out to dry. That said, nearly $4 billion for Pandora seems more excessive than even LinkedIn, which is currently valued at $7 billion. I would not buy either one at current prices, but given their addressable markets, business models, and competitive landscapes, LinkedIn seems to have more relative promise at current valuations. Time will tell.

Full Disclosure: No positions at the time of writing, but positions may change at any time

Enjoy this post? Subscribe and never miss another one: RSS | Email | Twitter

One Thought on “Pandora IPO Reminds Us What 1999 Felt Like

  1. Violet Weed on June 23, 2011 at 2:26 PM said:

    I suspect that Pandora will be successful simply because most people are sheep, and also hardly know anything at all about music. Frankly, though if I have the time to listen to music, I want to REALLY listen to it, so I either use my XM-Sirius online subscription or my xfinity tv music stations.
    Otherwise, I cannot get from Pandora what I really want: BOOK RADIO, and old-time Radio Classes. I can only get that from XmRadio or via audible.com downloads.

    But for me, Pandora brings nothing of value. I am a professional musician with 50 years musical training and expertise. Pandora doesn’t really play music ‘of a similar venue’ but music that sounds exactly the same as the music done by the artist whose name I first entered. Who listens to music that way? We make our own ‘series’ to play as we jog, drive, work, or hang out at home, reading a book (on our kindle, kindle app on our computer, nook, droid-x phone, or Motorola Xoom (the best, because of the ability to change the background and font colors). XM-Sirus Radio makes the ‘best’ series of music types, not as good as our individual ability to create the same using Windows, etc. media players or CD setups, but ‘closer’ than Pandora’.

Post Navigation